You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Justification for suggestion:
As currently written, you will filter out samples with a 0% success rate. In order to include counts of 0, you need to code the variable of interest as a factor and use the .drop argument of the count() function to retain all levels. Leaving out counts of 0 means graphing the sampling distribution will omit the left-most values. While this doesn't often occur with samples of size 50 and ample proportion p, can be an issue with small samples such as in Exercise 8 of this lab.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Chapter number: 15
Section number: Lab: Foundations for statistical inference - Sampling distributions
Other location identifier, if any (e.g., figure number, table number, footnote number, etc.):
Section Titled:
Interlude: Sampling distributions
Original text:
global_monitor %>% rep_sample_n(size = 50, reps = 15000, replace = TRUE) %>% count(scientist_work)
Suggestion for corrected text:
global_monitor %>% rep_sample_n(size = 50, reps = 15000, replace = TRUE) %>% mutate(scientist_work = as.factor(scientist_work)) |> count(scientist_work, .drop = FALSE)
Justification for suggestion:
As currently written, you will filter out samples with a 0% success rate. In order to include counts of 0, you need to code the variable of interest as a factor and use the
.drop
argument of thecount()
function to retain all levels. Leaving out counts of 0 means graphing the sampling distribution will omit the left-most values. While this doesn't often occur with samples of size 50 and ample proportion p, can be an issue with small samples such as in Exercise 8 of this lab.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: