-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: integration with Broadsea 3.0 #50
Comments
I'll need to amend my earlier statement: some alterations to Perseus may be needed, but ones that I think are useful.
|
Hi @alondhe, there's an issue template for this kind of thing - not to be bureaucratic, just to point out for example:
Without this the only vehicle for support is the time I volunteer for the Perseus users group. |
Hi @natb1 Do we need to create a new issue to use the template? I’m happy to do that if that’s the recommended approach. I can also work on the plan. |
I don't care about using the template as much as I think you'll have more luck finding support if we know who is providing the support and by what mechanism. There are no volunteers that I know of working on the project currently (other than my time on the user group). I'd be happy to help sort through the additional questions from the template if I just knew who was asking me to do it. |
Hi @natb1 -- apologies for the deviation from the prompts. As @leeevans said, we'll be leading this effort, with help from @bradanton for any PRs (like #52). Here's the latest:
|
As discussed with @leeevans, we'd like to add Perseus services to Broadsea. This would simply leverage Perseus docker images, not alter Perseus in any way.
With Broadsea 3.0, we use traefik as a proxy, so the idea would be to add Perseus services and middlewares that allow them to work with all other services in Broadsea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: