Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test_nf1850_trigrid #13

Open
mvertens opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

test_nf1850_trigrid #13

mvertens opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
NF1850 piControl - amip style

Comments

@mvertens
Copy link
Contributor

mvertens commented Jun 28, 2024

Purpose:
Trigrid simulation to be compared to #10


Description:
This simulation uses a 1 degree FV grid for CLM and a ne30pg3 grid for CAM and OCN. Moving fowards AMIP simulations with the trigrid should probably use the ocean on a tnx1v4 grid so the grid configuration for AMIP will look exactly like the grid configuration for fully coupled.


Compset long name
1850_CAM%DEV%LT%NORESM%CAMoslo_CLM51%SP_CICE%PRES_DOCN%DOM_MOSART_SGLC_SWAV_SESP


Model grid long name
a%ne30np4.pg3_l%0.9x1.25_oi%ne30np4.pg3_r%r05_w%null_z%null_g%null_m%tnx1v4


Case directory:

  • Locally
    /nird/datalake/NS2345K/mvertens/cases/test_nf1850oslo_trigrid

  • On github:
    In progress


Code version on github (either NorESMhub or user's fork):
https://github.com/mvertens/NorESM/tree/feature/noresm2_5_alpha03_v1


Diagnostics:

@oyvindseland has pointed out that it looks like the trigrid version has considerable lower dust concentration (and emissions?) to the extent that the cloud forcing is mid between nf1850oslo and ghgmam4.
Its important to note that with trigrid both the surface dataset and the initial dataset between the two runs will be different in addition to a remapping of states and fluxes between the atm and land. So these additional differences could possibly also help explain the larger than expected differences in some fields between the trigrid and dual grid configurations.


Output:

  • Raw output on nird (if still available):
    /nird/datalake/NS2345K/mvertens/test_nf1850oslo_trigrid
  • CAM Climos:

Contacts:
@mvertens


Extra details:

@mvertens mvertens added the NF1850 piControl - amip style label Jul 3, 2024
@rosiealice
Copy link

Noting that while it isn't totally clear to me why the dust is higher, it is typical to retune the dust in coupled model climates in any case. The way that FATES handles bare ground fraction is a little different too, so this might well need to happen in any case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
NF1850 piControl - amip style
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants