Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A number of texlive-new packages have hash mismatches #15183

Closed
peterhoeg opened this issue May 3, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

A number of texlive-new packages have hash mismatches #15183

peterhoeg opened this issue May 3, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
2.status: duplicate This is a duplicate of another issue or PR

Comments

@peterhoeg
Copy link
Member

peterhoeg commented May 3, 2016

Issue description

A number of texlive-new packages have hash mismatches. Looks like packages hosted at http://ftp.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/historic/systems/texlive/2015/tlnet-final/archive/ can just change underneath us and as the packages are not versioned, hence the mismatch.

Any other ideas how to solve this short of downloading the whole archive and scripting a recall of the packages?

Steps to reproduce

  1. Add texlive.combined.scheme-full to environment.systemPackages
  2. Watch several packages fail with hash mismatch:
    output path ‘/nix/store/ayq32cfk92kiysywxnb35xfhsm4j3wbq-2up.tar.xz’ has md5 hash ‘7bb1a159a6e50d7cb807c58f471e360e’ when ‘6160fbc7ab71be778081500b908d2648’ was expected

Technical details

  • NixOS: 16.09.git.52dd6dd (Flounder)
  • Nix: nix-env (Nix) 1.11.2
  • nixpkgs: "16.09pre79453.32b7b00"

cc @vcunat

@joachifm
Copy link
Contributor

joachifm commented May 3, 2016

Possibly this again #10026

@peterhoeg
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @joachifm, it definitely looks like the same thing. Closing as duplicate.

@vcunat vcunat added the 2.status: duplicate This is a duplicate of another issue or PR label May 4, 2016
@sorpaas sorpaas mentioned this issue May 9, 2016
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.status: duplicate This is a duplicate of another issue or PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants