Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

md5 hash mismatches when building soul from texlive-new #14589

Closed
PierreR opened this issue Apr 11, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

md5 hash mismatches when building soul from texlive-new #14589

PierreR opened this issue Apr 11, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
2.status: duplicate This is a duplicate of another issue or PR

Comments

@PierreR
Copy link
Contributor

PierreR commented Apr 11, 2016

Issue description

md5 hash mismatches when building soul tex package (texlive-combined)

Steps to reproduce

Using a custom config.nix with

{
  packageOverrides = super: let self = super.pkgs; in
  {
    myTex = self.texlive.combine {
     inherit (self.texlive) scheme-small collection-xetex collection-fontsrecommended collection-langfrench collection-plainextra xunicode framed paralist algorithms cm-super capt-of wrapfig minted bera pygmentex blindtext enumitem soul titlesec pstools ifplatform xstring ;
 };

As soon as soul is added, nix-env -f "<nixpkgs>" -iA myTex will fail with the following error:


trying http://ftp.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/historic/systems/texlive/2015/tlnet-final/archive/soul.tar.xz
  % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
                                 Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
100  5992  100  5992    0     0   1901      0  0:00:03  0:00:03 --:--:--  2192
output path ‘/nix/store/l2yv8ar5xz089bfvixa7wlgw6dy6dvcl-soul.tar.xz’ has md5 hash ‘0c006ff9d097d13a251a1a7aeb893efe’ when ‘456d5584a6966359a67880ca9f9516aa’ was expected

Technical details

  • System: NixOS: 16.03 (Emu)
  • Nix version: nix-env (Nix) 1.11.2
  • Nixpkgs version: 16.03.526.567b65d
@joachifm
Copy link
Contributor

Possibly dup of #10026

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Apr 12, 2016

Certainly.

@vcunat vcunat closed this as completed Apr 12, 2016
@vcunat vcunat added the 2.status: duplicate This is a duplicate of another issue or PR label Apr 12, 2016
@sorpaas sorpaas mentioned this issue May 9, 2016
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.status: duplicate This is a duplicate of another issue or PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants