Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional condition (BG > x for rising, BG < y for falling) for BG rising/falling alarms (Feature request) #532

Closed
dideldum opened this issue Aug 3, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@dideldum
Copy link

dideldum commented Aug 3, 2018

I like the BG rising/falling alarms, but they don't make sense always.

A BG falling alarm, when I come done from 250 due to a correction, is not interesting at all. But when I'm below, let's say 140-150, and BG falling applies, I'm VERY interested to prevent an upcoming hypo early.

Vice versa, if BG rising applies after a hypo, when I have taken fast carbs to rise again, this BG rising alarm is completely useless. But when I'm above 150-180, then the BG rising should indeed alarm me!

So I would like to have additional conditions for BG rising (only when > x) and BG falling (only when < y).

Would that be possible?

@dideldum dideldum changed the title Additional condition (BG > x for rising, BG < y for falling) for BG rising/falling alarms Additional condition (BG > x for rising, BG < y for falling) for BG rising/falling alarms (Feature request) Aug 3, 2018
@Navid200
Copy link
Collaborator

Duplicate:
#311

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants