You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi everyone!
Did anyone try an aggregate tokenizer with two or more different tokenizers using different alphabets?
For some reason when I do an inference on such a model, I get some words that are constructed from a mix of tokens from different tokenizers. I tested my tokenizers and they don't have an intersection alphabet or token-wise.
Did anyone else have such problems? How did you fix it?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi everyone!
Did anyone try an aggregate tokenizer with two or more different tokenizers using different alphabets?
For some reason when I do an inference on such a model, I get some words that are constructed from a mix of tokens from different tokenizers. I tested my tokenizers and they don't have an intersection alphabet or token-wise.
Did anyone else have such problems? How did you fix it?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions