Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Review passive chilled beam implementation and adjust to be more appropriate if needed #45

Open
pflaumingo opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Review passive chilled beam implementation and adjust to be more appropriate if needed #45

pflaumingo opened this issue Nov 15, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@pflaumingo
Copy link
Contributor

pflaumingo commented Nov 15, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Given a focus on sizing, develop a plan in this thread initially for how to appropriately implement passive chilled beams in OpenStudio. There is no radiant vs convective component specified in E+ so if we decide to incorporate a radiant component then it'll have to be a guess based on typical equipment.
@pflaumingo pflaumingo changed the title Create plan for passive chilled beam implementation Review passive chilled beam implementation and adjust to be more appropriate if needed Nov 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pflaumingo