Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more bort tests #446

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Apr 24, 2023
Merged

more bort tests #446

merged 25 commits into from
Apr 24, 2023

Conversation

edwardhartnett
Copy link
Contributor

@edwardhartnett edwardhartnett commented Apr 11, 2023

Part of #381

There's more bort testing to be done, but these tests are good and ready to be merged...

@edwardhartnett edwardhartnett marked this pull request as ready for review April 13, 2023 16:42
@jbathegit
Copy link
Collaborator

FYI, case 2 of ufbqcp is faulting with a SIGSEGV

@edwardhartnett
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, thanks for catching that. There's only one bort() in ufbqcp() so there should not even be a second test case. I've removed it.

@jbathegit jbathegit merged commit a9d90db into develop Apr 24, 2023
@edwardhartnett edwardhartnett deleted the ejh_bort_11 branch April 24, 2023 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants