Add intel build and code coverage

[edwardhartnett]

@kgerheiser can you do this one?

[edwardhartnett]

I have added code coverage...

We still need intel compiler build.

[edwardhartnett]

@kgerheiser how come when I do the code coverage commands on my own system, I get a nice looking coverage report like this:

But when I download the artifact and open it, it looks terrible:

[edwardhartnett]

I note that on my machine I seem to have gcovr 4.2 but our CI system is using 5.0. Perhaps that's part of the problem...

[edwardhartnett]

OK, one problem is that when we upload the coverage report files, we are grabbing all html, but there is also a css file to grab! We are missing it...

@kgerheiser this will probably have to be fixed everywhere. While fixing, also include the -e ../tests argument to gcovr, to leave the test code out of the code coverage report.

[edwardhartnett]

OK, adding the CSS file improves the download code coverage report:

So it looks better, which is nice. But it's also completely wrong. When I run it on my machine, I see a ~46% test coverage for bacio.c, which seems right, since I've just written a test which exercises that code a lot.

But when I download the coverage report, it still says 0% for bacio.c.

[edwardhartnett]

OK, this was because I had ctest --version instead of ctest --verbose! Now everything is working. I will close this issue.