Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a data provider, I want to add additional content to Investigation context products (mission phases, alias details, modification details) #765

Closed
jshughes opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@jshughes
Copy link
Collaborator

jshughes commented May 7, 2024

Checked for duplicates

Yes - I've already checked

πŸ§‘β€πŸ”¬ User Persona(s)

Data Engineer, Data Provider

πŸ’ͺ Motivation

The additional information can be used for Search and providing more information to users.

πŸ“– Additional Details

No response

Acceptance Criteria

TBD

βš™οΈ Engineering Details

The initial plan is to enhance the Investigation (Mission) class for Product_Context as follows:

Prototype the enhanced Investigation class ProtΓ©gΓ© and generated XML template.

  1. Add a terse description allowing no more than 255 characters
  2. Add prioritized Alias and Acronym lists - Done
  3. Add Mission Phase Information - Done
  4. Update Modification Details to include Author and Editor Lists

Create SCRs for modifications to Investigation Context Products to get DDWG approval

https://github.com/NASA-PDS/PDS4-CCB/issues/34
https://github.com/NASA-PDS/PDS4-CCB/issues/35
https://github.com/NASA-PDS/PDS4-CCB/issues/36.

πŸŽ‰ Integration & Test

TBD

@tloubrieu-jpl
Copy link
Member

tloubrieu-jpl commented May 7, 2024

@jshughes is making progress in this ticket.

@jordanpadams jordanpadams removed their assignment Jun 4, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Release Backlog in B15.0 Jun 4, 2024
@tloubrieu-jpl
Copy link
Member

DDWG verbally approved the changes.

@matthewtiscareno
Copy link

DDWG verbally approved the changes.

I strongly disagree with this characterization of the most recent DDWG meeting.

Concerns were raised, and the conversation has only begun. Please see CCB#34, CCB#35, and CCB#36.

@jordanpadams
Copy link
Member

DDWG verbally approved the changes.

@matthewtiscareno this was taken out of context of our stand-up meeting. I think this may have been placed on the wrong ticket. Apologies for the confusion.

@jordanpadams jordanpadams changed the title As a data provider for context information, I want to provide additional information about Investigations As a data provider, I want to add additional content to Investigation context products Jun 12, 2024
@jordanpadams
Copy link
Member

SCRs created. New tickets will be created for the actual SCRs and expected test cases.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from ToDo to 🏁 Done in EN Portfolio Backlog Sep 12, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Release Backlog to 🏁 Done in B15.0 Sep 12, 2024
@jordanpadams
Copy link
Member

Skipping I&T because the actual SCRs will include the appropriate test cases

@jordanpadams jordanpadams changed the title As a data provider, I want to add additional content to Investigation context products As a data provider, I want to add additional content to Investigation context products (mission phases, alias details, modification details) Oct 29, 2024
@jordanpadams jordanpadams added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: 🏁 Done
Status: 🏁 Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants