Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

consider adding a new getNode() to the main API #256

Open
KrabCode opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

consider adding a new getNode() to the main API #256

KrabCode opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@KrabCode
Copy link
Owner

you could get a simplified interface that represents a single AbstractNode and call things like hide() or reset() on it directly without specifying the path again - this could reduce main API bloat and hide it inside an object meant exactly for this single node manipulation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@KrabCode