Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Define Distances on Iterators #187

Closed
matthieugomez opened this issue Oct 23, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #194
Closed

Define Distances on Iterators #187

matthieugomez opened this issue Oct 23, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #194

Comments

@matthieugomez
Copy link
Contributor

matthieugomez commented Oct 23, 2020 •
edited
Loading

A lot of distances could be defined on any iterator. Would it be possible to relax the signature of evaluate? For instance Hamming makes sense for strings (e.g. (see matthieugomez/StringDistances.jl#35)) but, I cannot extend the method in StringDistances.jl without type piracy
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Allow generators and iterators dkarrasch/Distances.jl
1 participant
@matthieugomez