Considering some testnet content creators as Founding Members #3392
Replies: 4 comments 7 replies
-
I appreciate the input, and suppose I buy your points, I think what I am still missing is concrete proposition which actually would move us in the direction you are talking about. So who, gets what and how much, for doing what, as judged by whom. In particular, the scheme has to really explain how to exactly capture the essence of your core claims, for example that not all creators are the same. You would need to have a practical scheme for rewarding these daring creators, and not anyone looking to make a quick buck. Our lack of a good creator program is not out of stinginess, its that we don't have the time or wisdom to make it practical to generate satisfactory answers to such questions at this time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Really well written and compelling discussion you've started. You make very interesting and valid points. Outside of the Founding Member program... It's an area that requires a lot of thought for this platform, due to being Valuing content creators is something I've really thought about extensively and I've explored a lot of ideas. I hope at least some of them end up being feasible to develop after the platform launches. These are some of the considerations I've had, which might help to highlight some of the problems that will likely be encountered along the way:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Title: I'm just a gamer "I think the key divide between the interactive media and the narrative media is the difficulty in opening up an empathic pathway between the gamer and the character, as differentiated from the audience and the characters in a movie or a television show." Why Make Early Adoptiors Founders? 1.) Burnout 2.) Community & Culture 3.) Content 4.)Growth Life is a game The ability for creators to not only be independent but thrive in their own decentralized community with growth and support back from the community they are providing content in an inspired and dutiful way isn't just part of web3 but the reason to support web3. I think the real question is how to accomplish making early adaptors into founders in a fair way ; not if it should be done. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Title: A cathedral without the art is just a building.
"They should have sent a poet".
This is a famous quote by the character Ellie Arroway in Carl Sagan's book Contact. Her technical knowledge as a scientist paid no justice to what she was seeing when she travelled to another universe as she could not find the words to describe it.
This document will hopefully make the case that JoystreamDAO should consider some early adopter content creators as founding members of the DAO. Not just any content creator but those that are recognized by the community as active, invested in and helpful in bringing the project forward with their content.
This argument proposed in this document is not only about JoystreamDAO but it is a much broader scope, understanding that these are changing times in the way we interact and transact on the internet, but most importantly, understanding the shift in mindset required by culture to support these new ideas and technologies. It is my estimation (not my idea) that this is and has always been best done by ART. "Art is the lie that tells the truth" (quote attributed to many famous artists in history).
A science fiction writer (emphasis on the fiction) will inspire way more people about the future than any technical document. Before there was science there was philosophy and before philosophy there was already art. It's no coincidence as art gets to the deepest of our subconscious.
What I mean is that it's about bringing about culture. So it is not about JoystreamDAO, it's about all DAOs. We need Art and Poetry and Music to bring about the future in an inspiring way.
More of a continuation on the first point. Not all content creators are well versed in tech and culture. Most content creators, at the point in which this document is written, are still very much in Web2, and a big chunk of those will never go out into web3 but will instead wait for the platform in which they are already in to accept crypto payments and will happily accept their fate inside those walled gardens and will never skip a beat when someone brings up decentralization to them, especially if it's explained to them by technical people. For this you need a special breed of content creators, the early adopters that risked dropping Web2 in order to not just bring about Web3 but also to put it to the test. The ones that know that it is cultural, political and economic as much as it is technological. Those that push through the non user friendly interfaces to make sure that new platforms have users to test their tech with. Napster, Limewire or Kazaa would have not been P2P networks without the users that ventured out there in the undergrounds of culture to bring those into the mainstream. You need those who are daring and willing to disrupt.
"The special thing that we, regular biological humans have that the robots don't, is soul". -Douglas Rushkoff
Technocratic systems have always lacked humanity. We need a cultural, philosophical and ethical underpinning to the systems that we build. This is best done by being wrapped in story (art). This is why Shakespeare's plays are still to this day great representations of human behaviour, more so than technical psychology books. In them, we find the nature of relationships, self deprication, abuse of power, envy, greed, love and much more.
This is why I've titled this document, A cathedral without the art is just a building. We need the storytelling as human beings to move us, to hack awe, to compell us. We can't escape the storytelling even if we wanted to as we live inside narratives. These are best constructed by artists that understand culture. It gets to the human level.
We are moving to a highly technical not too distant future and the fear of many is that it will lack humanity. We need, for lack of a better word and to copy Rushkoff, "Soul". What I mean is that, us, the HUMANS that are using these new systems should have a decentralized ability to govern the new systems that are being built, if only to put in check the highly technical people that build them to avoid the abuses that rob us from our humanity i.e Web2 and weaponization of data.
This is a straight forward point and is strictly about JoystreamDAO.
You don't just want early adopters during testnet period you absolutely more than anything NEED them as you can't put a video platform to the test unless you have a large amount of videos, and it is only fair that community members that are uploading videos on the regular during testnet be considered as founding members as they are the foundation in which the whole platform is able to be tested and deployed.
They should be awarded DAO/FM tokens and should have voting power relative to their participation during this instrumental time. Things to consider may be time on Atlas, number of videos, participation in video bounties, referrals, and if they are active in the community. This determines the amount of tokens awarded and therefore the voting power that each content creator has.
Conclusion:
It is my hope that this non-technical short document can illuminate to the Founding Members of JoystreamDAO that content creators, especially artists, are not only helpful but necessary in the development and communication of the project and it's goals to the broader population.
Let us, the content creators, tell our decentralized version of the story to those that follow us in order to help grow the JoystreamDao community and consider that a valuable contribution.
Thank you for your consideration and for reading
Sincerely,
Eclipsing Binary
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions