JMaria conducted a security review of the protocol name protocol, which was limited to a specific time frame. The review primarily focused on the security aspects of the application's implementation.
JMaria, also known as devScrooge on social networks, is a Telecommunications and Blockchain Engineer who currently works full-time as a DeFi developer and also performs security audits for smart contracts. He strives to make valuable contributions to the blockchain ecosystem and its protocols by dedicating his time and effort to conducting security research and performing thorough security reviews.
Socials: Webpage Twitter LinkedIn Github ResearchGate
A brief description about the audited protocol
Vulnerability Level | Classification |
---|---|
Critical | Easily exploitable by anyone, causing loss/manipulation of assets or data. |
High | Arduously exploitable by a subset of addresses, causing loss/manipulation of assets or data. |
Medium | Inherent risk of future exploits that may or may not impact the smart contract execution due to current or future implementations. |
Low | Minor deviation from best practices. |
Gas | Gas Optimization |
Project Name | |
---|---|
Language | Solidity |
Codebase | |
Commit | xxxxx |
Delivery Date | 05/25/2023 |
---|---|
Audit Methodology | Static Analysis, Manual Review |
review commit hash - fffffffffff
The following smart contracts were in scope of the audit:
SmartContractName
SmartContractName
SmartContractName
SmartContractName
The following number of issues were found, categorized by their severity:
- Critical: x issues
- High: x issues
- Medium: x issues
- Low: x issues
- Informational: x issues
- Gas: x issues
ID | Title | Severity |
---|---|---|
C-01 | Critical Issue Title | Critical |
H-01 | High Issue Title | High |
M-01 | Medium Issue Title | Medium |
L-1 | Low Issue Title | Low |
GAS-01 | Gas Issue Title | Gas |
I-04 | Informational Issue Title | Informational |
A comprehensive evaluation of smart contract security can never guarantee the absolute absence of vulnerabilities. Such an evaluation is subject to limitations in terms of time, resources, and expertise, and aims to identify as many potential vulnerabilities as possible. Therefore, even after the evaluation, it cannot be ensured that 100% security has been achieved, or that any potential issues with the smart contracts have been identified. It is strongly recommended to conduct subsequent security reviews, bug bounty programs, and on-chain monitoring to ensure continued security.