-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Seaice over land after the analysis insertion #1131
Comments
The other item to check is whether any ice volume exists where there is no associated ice coverage (aicen=0 but vicen /= 0) |
I'm hoping this is resolved now by calling icepack's cleanup_itd in initialization, but we'll need to check. |
🤞 |
I started working on it, and couldn't make any ice over land in my test as hard as I tried. Looks like someone smart already added code to make sure we're outputting zero over land:
I'll double check that the second concern
is covered by cleanup_itd before closing this. |
@shlyaeva Thanks for the followup. I found a third condition also, which is to check for whether there is snow volume (vsnon) where there is no aicen. The opposite is fine I think---ice can have no snow coverage. |
I just confirmed that if I change the code that puts analysis into the CICE restart files and artificially set vsnon and vicen to be non-zero when aicen is zero, cleanup_itd that is called at the end resets those values back to zero. So I think the current code covers all the issues reported here. OK with everyone to close? |
From my perspective, it seems like whatever was previously the problem has been fixed in the intervening years. So, all is good. |
Description
This was mentioned here:
ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#2562 (comment)
But the discussion above is based on a ~2 yo version of the soca to cice variable change. It's possible that it has been fixed, but better double check.
To Reproduce:
Run soca2cice and check that we have no sea ice over land.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: