We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dear Helmut! I think it would be good to add some warnings about matrix rank deficiency to cope the cases when the user's input is not correct
library(replicateBE) rds01$treatment <- as.factor(sapply(as.character(rds01$period), switch, `1` = "R", `2` = "R", `3` = "T", `4` = "T")) method.A(data = rds01) #Error in if (round(res$"CL.lo(%)", 2) >= 100 * ret$BE1 & round(res$"CL.hi(%)", : #missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed` method.B(data = rds01) # Error in MEEM(object, conLin, control$niterEM) : # Singularity in backsolve at level 0, block 1 method.B(data = rds01, option = 3) fixed-effect model matrix is rank deficient so dropping 1 column / coefficient #Error in EMA.B$coefficients["treatmentT", "Estimate"] : # subscript out of bounds ``` lm() does not inform about any collinear effects, I think it is better to use 'singular.ok = TRUE' and transform the error to the warning lme() is also not polite in the error, but we can add more informative error, suggesting to check the data for collinear effects and typos.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Dear Helmut!
I think it would be good to add some warnings about matrix rank deficiency to cope the cases when the user's input is not correct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: