Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hdf5 1 12 #28

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 8, 2020
Merged

Hdf5 1 12 #28

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 8, 2020

Conversation

byrnHDF
Copy link
Contributor

@byrnHDF byrnHDF commented Oct 7, 2020

The vfd test comments out the splitter test temporarily until it can fixed with later commits.

Copy link
Contributor

@qkoziol qkoziol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe that the code in the test/vfd.c file is correct in 1.12 and somehow was mis-merged or lost in develop. That should be fixed, but otherwise, everything else looks OK.

hid_t split_fapl_id = H5I_INVALID_HID;
herr_t ret = SUCCEED;
int ret_value = 0;
H5FD_splitter_vfd_config_t *vfd_config = NULL;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And here.


if (splitter_prepare_file_paths(&vfd_config, filename_rw) < 0) {
char * filename_rw = NULL;
H5FD_splitter_vfd_config_t *vfd_config = NULL;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here, too.

hid_t file_id = H5I_INVALID_HID;
const char * filename_tmp = "splitter_tmp.h5";
char * filename_rw = NULL;
H5FD_splitter_vfd_config_t *vfd_config = NULL;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here

@byrnHDF
Copy link
Contributor Author

byrnHDF commented Oct 7, 2020

The vfd.c file is identical in 1.10 and develop. splitter test is not 1.8 vfd.c.
The changes in this PR will now match those branches, if there is an issue then issue will need to be created.

@lrknox
Copy link
Collaborator

lrknox commented Oct 7, 2020

The vfd test comments out the splitter test temporarily until it can fixed with later commits.

Can you create the issue with any information you have as to where and how the vfd splitter test fails in 1.12?
If the 1.12 code in vfd.c is better, should develop not be merged to this file?

@lrknox lrknox merged commit 2987442 into HDFGroup:hdf5_1_12 Oct 8, 2020
hyoklee referenced this pull request in hyoklee/hdf5 Feb 12, 2021
…/bounds_compat

* commit '181c6110251d7a9e9cc23e14dfd8f52cdb14422b':
  Correct macro check
vchoi-hdfgroup added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2021
@bmribler bmribler mentioned this pull request Jul 2, 2023
@oss-patch oss-patch mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants