Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seek better tooling integration by using fuel-toolchain.toml #2425

Closed
nedsalk opened this issue May 31, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2619
Closed

Seek better tooling integration by using fuel-toolchain.toml #2425

nedsalk opened this issue May 31, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2619
Labels
chore Issue is a chore

Comments

@nedsalk
Copy link
Contributor

nedsalk commented May 31, 2024

It is possible to define a fuel-toolchain.toml file at the root of a project to use a specific forc and fuel-core version for that project and fuelup will pick it up and use it instead of the currently active global toolchain. Defining this file in our repo would make our internal forc and fuel-core packages obsolete and we could remove them altogether.

@nedsalk nedsalk added the chore Issue is a chore label May 31, 2024
@arboleya
Copy link
Member

I don't believe we can eliminate the internal packages, as they act as a backbone for development.

But if we can better integrate all the tools, we should.

@arboleya arboleya changed the title Use fuel-toolchain.toml instead of internal/forc,fuel-core Seek better tooling integration by using fuel-toolchain.toml May 31, 2024
@arboleya arboleya added the p2 label Jun 9, 2024
@arboleya arboleya added this to the 0.x post-launch milestone Jun 12, 2024
@arboleya arboleya removed this from the 0.x post-launch milestone Jul 19, 2024
@arboleya arboleya closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore Issue is a chore
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants