Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Split csm_share #852

Closed
jedwards4b opened this issue Nov 30, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Split csm_share #852

jedwards4b opened this issue Nov 30, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
@asteyer
Labels
Assigned tp: src shr ty: enhancement

Comments

@jedwards4b
Copy link
Contributor

The csm_share library is a mix of several application libraries and should be split into
several pieces. This issue was discussed in CESM-Development/cime issue 18.
@jedwards4b
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also see CESM_DEVELOPMENT issue 96

@rljacob rljacob closed this as completed in 3075fcc Feb 8, 2017
@jgfouca jgfouca reopened this Feb 8, 2017
@billsacks billsacks mentioned this issue Feb 16, 2017
Closed
@jedwards4b
Copy link
Contributor Author

This issue wasn't intended to be just about renaming the directory. The intent is to separate the code into topic libraries. I see three libraries: foundation code like shr_kinds_mod.F90 or shr_const_mod.F90 doesn't have any dependencies within the model or with external libraries such as mpi, mpi interface code doesn't have any internal dependencies but does depend on the mpi library and finally component interface code which may depend on pio.

@jedwards4b jedwards4b mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2017
Closed
@jedwards4b jedwards4b mentioned this issue Oct 16, 2017
Closed
@jgfouca
Copy link
Contributor

jgfouca commented Sep 26, 2018

This should be done in the CMake refactor.

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

Closing since this no longer applies to CIME.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@asteyer asteyer

Labels
Assigned tp: src shr ty: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@rljacob @jedwards4b @billsacks @jgfouca @asteyer