You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From @vlarson: The current calculation of the neutral drag coefficient at 10 m (cdn) in subroutine shr_flux_atmOcn and subroutine shr_flux_atmOcn_diurnal does not include a moderating effect at wind speeds greater than 30 m/s. This rollover effect can be incorporated using equation (11a,b) of Large and Yeager (2009, Climate Dynamics).
From @zarzycki: Personally, I don't see any downside -- at lower surface wind speeds the LY09 equation collapses to what is currently in CIME. I have never done a gridpoint PDF of U10 at 1deg, but I can't fathom there being more than a handful of grid cells that ever see that wind speed so the solution should be effectively identical.
However, we have found benefits for tropical cyclones pressure-wind relationships at 0.25deg with the drag saturation (i.e., LY09).
FWIW, my patch is below (with some other Cd profiles I was playing around with as well...)
qsat(Tk) = 640380.0_R8 / exp(5107.4_R8/Tk)
- cdn(Umps) = 0.0027_R8 / Umps + 0.000142_R8 + 0.0000764_R8 * Umps
+!++CMZ
+! Large and Yeager 2009
+ cdn(Umps) = 0.0027_R8 / min(33.0000_R8,Umps) + 0.000142_R8 + 0.0000764_R8 * min(33.0000_R8,Umps) - 3.14807e-13_r8 * min(33.0000_R8,Umps)**6
+! Capped Large and Pond by wind
+! cdn(Umps) = 0.0027_R8 / min(30.0_R8,Umps) + 0.000142_R8 + 0.0000764_R8 * min(30.0_R8,Umps)
+! Capped Large and Pond by Cd
+! cdn(Umps) = min(0.0025_R8, (0.0027_R8 / Umps + 0.000142_R8 + 0.0000764_R8 * Umps ))
+! Large and Pond
+! cdn(Umps) = 0.0027_R8 / Umps + 0.000142_R8 + 0.0000764_R8 * Umps
+!--CMZ
psimhu(xd) = log((1.0_R8+xd*(2.0_R8+xd))*(1.0_R8+xd*xd)/8.0_R8) - 2.0_R8*atan(xd) + 1.571_R8
psixhu(xd) = 2.0_R8 * log((1.0_R8 + xd*xd)/2.0_R8)
Reopening this: ESMCI/cime#3149
From @vlarson: The current calculation of the neutral drag coefficient at 10 m (cdn) in subroutine shr_flux_atmOcn and subroutine shr_flux_atmOcn_diurnal does not include a moderating effect at wind speeds greater than 30 m/s. This rollover effect can be incorporated using equation (11a,b) of Large and Yeager (2009, Climate Dynamics).
From @zarzycki: Personally, I don't see any downside -- at lower surface wind speeds the LY09 equation collapses to what is currently in CIME. I have never done a gridpoint PDF of U10 at 1deg, but I can't fathom there being more than a handful of grid cells that ever see that wind speed so the solution should be effectively identical.
However, we have found benefits for tropical cyclones pressure-wind relationships at 0.25deg with the drag saturation (i.e., LY09).
FWIW, my patch is below (with some other Cd profiles I was playing around with as well...)
Relevant CMEPS lines: https://github.com/ESCOMP/CMEPS/blob/98dcf46c8886104b95cddfd5b02588b3dd9f6722/cesm/flux_atmocn/shr_flux_mod.F90#L262C1-L262C72
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: