When contributing to this repository, please first discuss the change you wish to make via issue, email, or any other method with the owners of this repository before making a change.
Please note we have a code of conduct, please follow it in all your interactions with the project.
We use Conventional Commits to ensure that our commits are in a consistent format.
The commit message should be structured as follows:
<type>[optional scope]: <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
The commit contains the following structural elements, to communicate intent to the consumers of your library:
- fix: a commit of the type
fix
patches a bug in your codebase (this correlates withPATCH
in Semantic Versioning). - feat: a commit of the type
feat
introduces a new feature to the codebase (this correlates withMINOR
in Semantic Versioning). - BREAKING CHANGE: a commit that has a footer
BREAKING CHANGE:
, or appends a!
after the type/scope, introduces a breaking API change (correlating withMAJOR
in Semantic Versioning). A BREAKING CHANGE can be part of commits of any type. - types other than
fix:
andfeat:
are allowed, for example @commitlint/config-conventional (based on the the Angular convention) recommendsbuild:
,chore:
,ci:
,docs:
,style:
,refactor:
,perf:
,test:
, and others. - footers other than
BREAKING CHANGE: <description>
may be provided and follow a convention similar to git trailer format.
Additional types are not mandated by the Conventional Commits specification, and have no implicit effect in Semantic Versioning (unless they include a BREAKING CHANGE).
A scope may be provided to a commit's type, to provide additional contextual information and is contained within parenthesis, e.g., feat(parser): add ability to parse arrays
.
- Ensure any install or build dependencies are removed before the end of the layer when doing a build.
- Update the README.md with details of changes to the interface, this includes new environment variables, exposed ports, useful file locations and container parameters.
- Increase the version numbers in any examples files and the README.md to the new version that this Pull Request would represent. The versioning scheme we use is SemVer.
- You may merge the Pull Request in once you have the sign-off of two other developers, or if you do not have permission to do that, you may request the second reviewer to merge it for you.