Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Research for grounding "a priori situational awareness" framework into prior literature #2

Open
5 tasks done
zephirefaith opened this issue Jun 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@zephirefaith
Copy link
Collaborator

zephirefaith commented Jun 8, 2019

  • Read Norman's interaction design principles
  • Read Norman's seven-stage model of action
  • Read Scholtz 2002, where she introduces first three roles
  • Re-read Scholtz 2003
  • Briefly cover Norman's "design of future things"
@zephirefaith zephirefaith self-assigned this Jun 8, 2019
@zephirefaith zephirefaith changed the title Research for grounding a priori situational awareness framework into prior literature Research for grounding "a priori situational awareness" framework into prior literature Jun 8, 2019
@zephirefaith
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zephirefaith commented Jun 10, 2019

Norman (design of everyday things, chapter 1) describes the following artifacts which explain an interaction:

  1. Affordance: Relationship between the object and the agent. Depends on the qualities of the object and the intention of the agent.
  2. Signifiers: Tell the agent what kind of affordances can be established with the object.
  3. Feedback: The closing loop for the affordance action instantiated.
  4. Conceptual model: The mental model that the agent has for the object. Need not be complete, just accurate enough to support the affordance.

The above-mentioned terms relate with our A Priori Situational Awareness framework in the following way:

  1. Affordance ↔️ Interaction - Communication interaction that is instantiated between a human-human, human-robot, robot-human pair for coordination.
  2. Signifiers ↔️ Local Dynamics - The dependencies, role-relationships, team-based protocols between the agents help them understand if the communication instantiation is required at all to support coordination
  3. Feedback - This in itself can be considered a mode of interaction between an agent pair. This is required to support affordances in-action.
  4. Conceptual model ↔️ A Priori Information of each role Required agent model for each role - The levels of expertise in task, environment, and teamwork agent knowledge are actually guidelines for making sure the prior training of roles is enough to support online conceptual models.

@zephirefaith
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Goodrich and Schultz, 2008:

To this list, we add the following:

  • Mentor: the robot is in a teaching or leadership role for the human, and
  • Information Consumer: the human does not control the robot, but the human uses information coming from the robot in, for example, a reconnaissance task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant