Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial Meeting 12 Jan #67

Closed
bumblefudge opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Editorial Meeting 12 Jan #67

bumblefudge opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@bumblefudge
Copy link
Collaborator

PRs to refine/move to close

  • LAST LAST CALL on 179
    • _ removed on purpose or error of merge conflict resolution?
    • merge once _ is approved by joel and pedro
  • Update on DagJWS - waiting to refactor until 196 is merged

Ongoing projects/topics

  • Has everyone seen ligi's PR or Discussion?
    • remove blocks and tokens, add them back in as a separate extension CAIP if at all?
      • blocks? (versus block)
      • tokens? redundant to address/contract interface?
      • Juan: I will open that separate CAIP once this has shaken out a bit and I've seen how this was received/refined by implementers
    • Pedro: Removing better than adding
    • Ligi: original EIP is stagnant?
      • Pedro: Isn't an EIP that depends on it (wallet_add_ethereum) final? Nope, stagnant as well even though widely adopted in practice...
      • Ligi: regardless of fate of EIP, CAIP should be the current-state/used state
    • Bumblefudge posting to discord for more eyes
  • Joel's CACAO update, with breaking changes and relying on varsig and multidid
    • timeline-- can we leave it in DRAFT until varsig and multidid are v1?
    • have reached out to Spruce for initial feedback; anyone else who should be reached out to proactively?
    • Pedro - this is feeling like a v2, not a v1.1... isn't there a version string for this?
      • Juan: Separate/new CAIP #?
      • Rocco: the 4 versions of EIP712? 4 versions withing on EIP?
      • Rocco: With SIWE EIP, we tried to freeze the grammar itself cuz everything else could be a minor breaking changes if it broke...
      • Pedro: Process versus Reality: cAIP-19 isn't final but there are huge implementations using it
      • Consensus --> new CAIP -
  • CAIP-25 update: stable Draft last month, now focusing efforts on CAIP-27 and CAIP-171 (as needed)
  • CI for CAIPs - no progress on juan's side, let me know if urgent
    • req: FINAL CAIPs should not accept PRs!
  • Metamask/EVM signing of IPLD objects thread in IPFS

Backlog

  • namespaces
    • algorand/caip-2 just added last night!
    • stacks - PR open, on me
    • tezos/caip10 & caip122 - One review, on me
    • StarkNet - on me
    • sui - proceeding
    • zcash - Juan dropped email thread, restarted earlier today
    • filecoin - on me, will continue
    • outreach still appreciated for cosmos, polkadot, monero, chainlink, and radicle
  • clean up jekyll publication and test/fine-tune workflow for CAIP PRs
    • in partic a sidebar with table-of-contents within long CAIPs would be killer
    • how urgent, relative to namespaces and CAIPs themselves?
  • varsig and multidid - Juan is a little resource-constrained but will get to it this month - V2
    • Pedro - are the authors really waiting on you here?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant