Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jrsonnet-evaluator 0.4.2 EvaluationState::stringify_err panics with empty source code #83

Closed
huin opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #84
Closed

jrsonnet-evaluator 0.4.2 EvaluationState::stringify_err panics with empty source code #83

huin opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #84

Comments

@huin
Copy link

huin commented Sep 16, 2022

Thanks for the library - I've found it very powerful.

I've run into the following edge case when evaluating empty files. The following code panics, but it should correctly format the error.

use std::{
    path::{Path, PathBuf},
    rc::Rc,
};

use jrsonnet_evaluator::{EvaluationState, FileImportResolver, ManifestFormat};

fn main() {
    let vm = EvaluationState::default();
    vm.with_stdlib();
    vm.set_manifest_format(ManifestFormat::Json(0));
    vm.set_import_resolver(Box::new(FileImportResolver::default()));

    // println!("Evaluating 0");
    // run(&vm, "0");
    // println!("Evaluating syntax error");
    // run(&vm, "syntax error");
    println!("Evaluating empty");
    run(&vm, "");
}

fn run(vm: &EvaluationState, code: &str) {
    let source: Rc<Path> = PathBuf::new().into();
    let result = vm.evaluate_snippet_raw(source.clone(), code.into());

    match result {
        Ok(v) => eprintln!("  no error: {:?}", v),
        Err(e) => {
            eprintln!("  LocError: {:?}", e);
            eprintln!("  stringify_err:");
            eprintln!("    {}", vm.stringify_err(&e));  // This panics when code == "".
        }
    }
}

Stack trace:

Evaluating empty
  LocError: LocError((ImportSyntaxError { path: "", source_code: "", error: ParseError { location: LineCol { line: 1, column: 1, offset: 0 }, expected: ExpectedSet { expected: {"\"[\"", "\"{\"", "<number>", "\"(\"", "<string>", "<whitespace>", "<identifier>", "<unary op>"} } } }, StackTrace([])))
  stringify_err:
thread 'main' panicked at 'attempt to subtract with overflow', /home/huin/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/jrsonnet-evaluator-0.4.2/src/trace/mod.rs:101:26
stack backtrace:
   0: rust_begin_unwind
             at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/std/src/panicking.rs:584:5
   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
             at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/core/src/panicking.rs:142:14
   2: core::panicking::panic
             at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/core/src/panicking.rs:48:5
   3: <jrsonnet_evaluator::trace::CompactFormat as jrsonnet_evaluator::trace::TraceFormat>::write_trace
             at /home/huin/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/jrsonnet-evaluator-0.4.2/src/trace/mod.rs:101:14
   4: jrsonnet_evaluator::EvaluationState::stringify_err
             at /home/huin/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/jrsonnet-evaluator-0.4.2/src/lib.rs:328:3
   5: jrsonnet_panic::run
             at ./src/main.rs:31:33
   6: jrsonnet_panic::main
             at ./src/main.rs:19:5
   7: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
             at /rustc/4b91a6ea7258a947e59c6522cd5898e7c0a6a88f/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.

The commented out code (if uncommented) runs without a panic, for comparison.

It looks like the affected line has already been fixed in [df9bc99], so it's just pending a release.

@CertainLach
Copy link
Owner

I recommend using not yet released code for development, I think I'll prepare a new release (v0.5.0) after #82 is merged

@huin
Copy link
Author

huin commented Sep 24, 2022

Thanks, that works. I'll stay on 0.4.2 for now as this issue isn't causing me immediate problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants