Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 27, 2022. It is now read-only.

revert_port #567

Closed
wants to merge 26 commits into from
Closed

revert_port #567

wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

kylehogan
Copy link
Contributor

addresses issue #508

  • call to remove all vlan access
  • show port call
  • revert_port can reinstate network attachments that were present in haas database
  • test the case where there are multiple network attachments

@kylehogan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ron-unrau
my show_switch can be seen in the api here. I also have a few unit tests for it. Can you let me know if you decide to use any of it and I can then review it in your pull request and remove it from here? Thanks!

@ron-unrau
Copy link
Contributor

The basic framework of my implementation is exactly the same as yours, the
only difference is that I was going to return the information provided in
switch_register, while yours is returning the info from
switch_register_port.

I don't speak github yet, but in my world we would have said: since your
review is pretty much done, you may as well push your changes to the
mainline, and then I can pull them into my branch and add the extra fields.
(Did that make any sense to you?)

I don't think anyone is really waiting for the stuff in my show_switch
implementation, and besides, I have no idea how to handle the polymorphism
yet anyway. In summary, I think it's fine if my changes wait for a week.

< ron

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:58 PM, kylehogan notifications@github.com wrote:

@ron-unrau https://github.com/ron-unrau
my show_switch can be seen in the api here. I also have a few unit tests
for it. Can you let me know if you decide to use any of it and I can then
review it in your pull request and remove it from here? Thanks!


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#567 (comment)

@kylehogan
Copy link
Contributor Author

This pull request is blocked until it can get tested in a development environment because of the revert_port functionality so nothing in here will get merged soon. Because of that it may be better to keep show_port as your separate pull request.

@kylehogan kylehogan mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2016
@matsuuran
Copy link
Contributor

@kylehogan @ron-unrau
just wanted to see if this would be able to be tested on the server @SahilTikale is setting up

@shuwens
Copy link
Contributor

shuwens commented Jun 21, 2016

I have tested the functions included in devhaas, but it looks like some of them are broken.

I fixed the schema before that. If there are no PR regarding any functions related then I guess I have to fix broken ones by myself.

@shuwens shuwens mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2016
4 tasks
@matsuuran
Copy link
Contributor

@shwsun just wanted to see how this was going

@shuwens
Copy link
Contributor

shuwens commented Jul 14, 2016

@matsuuran I guess we should close this one and I will reference it in my PR.

@matsuuran
Copy link
Contributor

@henn @SahilTikale @gsilvis can you close this? there is another PR open for this #621

@henn
Copy link
Contributor

henn commented Jul 20, 2016

Done!

@henn henn closed this Jul 20, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants