Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 10, 2025. It is now read-only.

[Draft] Reputation spec #12

Closed
aljazceru opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

[Draft] Reputation spec #12

aljazceru opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@aljazceru
Copy link
Collaborator

aljazceru commented Dec 6, 2022

While working on [https://github.com/BitcoinAndLightningLayerSpecs/lsp/blob/main/liquidity-marketplace-spec.md](liquidity marketplace spec) we established the need for node reputation systems and this issue is an initial outline (based on the few discussions we had around this) to start the conversation

Discussions around reputation and solving channel jamming:
https://github.com/microlancer/LNREP
lightning/bolts#1043
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2022-November/003754.html

Node reputation is a metric with which we express various objective and subjective attributes that describe node behavior.

Problems:

  • not all data is objective (latency, node management)
  • how to establish trust for data, specially one that is self attested and unverifiable
  • establishing web of trust by signing the attestations (reputation of reputation provider?)
  • how to incentivize good behavior?
  • historical data is important and not everyone has it so you'll need to trust someone
  • how to express the reputation (one number vs data vs multiple numbers different weighted)

reputation:

  • objective attributes
    • (historical) channel age
    • node age
    • number of chans
    • chan size distribution
    • fees
    • historical fee movements
    • capacity
    • centrality/graph positioning
  • relative attributes
    • latency
    • node management
      • (historical) well balanced channels
      • (historical) node uptime
    • graph positioning
  • subjective attributes
    • abiding by agreed upon ToS (example channel duration/fee schedule for channel leases)
@aljazceru
Copy link
Collaborator Author

closing for now as we are not working on that, can be reopened if the efforts restart

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant