Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[AutoPR sdk/storage/mgmt-v2019_06_01] Moved storage private link related models into common types #2753

Conversation

openapi-sdkautomation[bot]
Copy link

Created to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#8935.

Installation Instructions

You can install the package sdk/storage/mgmt-v2019_06_01 of this PR by downloading the artifact jar files. Then ensure that the jar files are on your project's classpath.

Direct Download

The generated package artifacts can be directly downloaded from here:

@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAutomation/sdk_storage_mgmt-v2019_06_01@8935 branch 2 times, most recently from 8b4c3a7 to b979194 Compare April 10, 2020 19:28
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAutomation/sdk_storage_mgmt-v2019_06_01 branch 6 times, most recently from fa977eb to 8fe7099 Compare May 5, 2020 19:13
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAutomation/sdk_storage_mgmt-v2019_06_01 branch 10 times, most recently from 28c32de to 067cca5 Compare May 12, 2020 07:32
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAutomation/sdk_storage_mgmt-v2019_06_01@8935 branch from b979194 to 14233e3 Compare May 12, 2020 07:32
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot force-pushed the sdkAutomation/sdk_storage_mgmt-v2019_06_01 branch from 067cca5 to 4408f61 Compare May 12, 2020 22:05
@openapi-sdkautomation openapi-sdkautomation bot deleted the sdkAutomation/sdk_storage_mgmt-v2019_06_01@8935 branch May 13, 2020 00:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants