-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[core-http] Remove the FetchHttpClient #18863
[core-http] Remove the FetchHttpClient #18863
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I love this change, just one minor comment
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | |||
// Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we still need this? I'm curious how the browser is pulling in NodeFetchHttpClient
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ohh probably not. I will confirm in a bit!
API changes have been detected in API changes - export declare class NodeFetchHttpClient extends FetchHttpClient {
+ export declare class NodeFetchHttpClient implements HttpClient {
+ sendRequest(httpRequest: WebResourceLike): Promise<HttpOperationResponse>;
- export declare abstract class FetchHttpClient implements HttpClient {
- abstract fetch(input: CommonRequestInfo, init?: CommonRequestInit): Promise<CommonResponse>;
- abstract prepareRequest(httpRequest: WebResourceLike): Promise<Partial<RequestInit>>;
- abstract processRequest(operationResponse: HttpOperationResponse): Promise<void>;
- sendRequest(httpRequest: WebResourceLike): Promise<HttpOperationResponse>;
- } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
Just for the history the abstraction is because we used to have a browserFetchHttpClient (but never use it and removed it at some point)
https://github.com/Azure/ms-rest-js/blob/master/lib/browserFetchHttpClient.ts
This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer. What is Check Enforcer?Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass. Why am I getting this message?You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged. What should I do now?If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows: What if I am onboarding a new service?Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them, in order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, you can issue the following command as a pull request comment: |
The
FetchHttpClient
was used as the base abstract class for theDefaultHttpClient
, however it wasn’t exposed until this very recent PR: #18755This PR looks to remove the
FetchHttpClient
.