Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

move some classes that should belong to core to the core. #390

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2013
Merged

move some classes that should belong to core to the core. #390

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2013

Conversation

gcheng
Copy link

@gcheng gcheng commented Jul 31, 2013

No description provided.

@gcheng gcheng mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2013
Closed
@gcheng
Copy link
Author

gcheng commented Jul 31, 2013

from @tedglaza-msft
Looks great Al.

Thanks,
Ted

gcheng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2013
Merge pull request #390 from gcheng/morecore
4134be0 
move some classes that should belong to core to the core.
@gcheng gcheng merged commit 4134be0 into Azure:dev Jul 31, 2013
jianghaolu pushed a commit to jianghaolu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2017
Merge pull request Azure#390 from gcheng/morecore
27b0450 
move some classes that should belong to core to the core.
sima-zhu pushed a commit to sima-zhu/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
@RikkiGibson
Various minor improvements (Azure#396)
9125441 
* Remove Apache Commons dependency

* HttpClientFactory.close() instead of shutdown()

* Use per-instance lock in SharedChannelPool. Fixes Azure#388

* Fix condition wait in SharedChannelPool. Fixes Azure#390

* Disable test for close() with in-flight request

* Fix checkstyle
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@gcheng