If we need OpenSSL >= 3.0.2, say so instead of 1.1.1n

[antkmsft]

"[W]e're at OpenSSL 3.0.2, I believe, not 1.1.1n."

Originally posted by @LarryOsterman in #3701 (comment)

[antkmsft]

@LarryOsterman Would you mind to check if we do require min version of 3.0.2, and update all occurrences of "1.1.1n" (there might be more than in this PR), or in general if there is ever a dependency on openssl without min version specification, also put it there?

[LarryOsterman]

We shouldn't have any version dependencies in packages unless we have a strict requirement that a package be greater than a particular value. Otherwise we should let the vcpkg base line determine the package.

For instance, we require OpenTelemetry 1.3.0 (because we require a bug fix which is only available in OpenTelemetry 1.3.0). But we don't have such a requirement for OpenSSL, just that we have the most recent version in teh vcpkg baseline.

[antkmsft]

So, should we drop all "version>=" for OpenSSL then?
I think you added the "version>=", and you're the biggest OpenSSL user, can you remove it?

[LarryOsterman]

I have the fix ready for my next PR