Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix mysql sku values #4994

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 16, 2019
Merged

Fix mysql sku values #4994

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 16, 2019

Conversation

zikalino
Copy link

@zikalino zikalino commented Jan 5, 2019

Gen4 values are not supported/valid any more.

Latest improvements:

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

  • I have reviewed the documentation for the workflow.
  • Validation tools were run on swagger spec(s) and have all been fixed in this PR.
  • The OpenAPI Hub was used for checking validation status and next steps.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Service team MUST add the "WaitForARMFeedback" label if the management plane API changes fall into one of the below categories.
  • adding/removing APIs.
  • adding/removing properties.
  • adding/removing API-version.
  • adding a new service in Azure.

Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged urgently, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
    Please follow the link to find more details on API review process.

@openapi-portal-comment
Copy link

If you're a MSFT employee, click this link
to view this PR's validation status on our new OpenAPI Hub spec management tool.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-js

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-ruby

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented Jan 5, 2019

Automation for azure-sdk-for-java

Unable to detect any generation context from this PR.

@kpajdzik kpajdzik added the review label Jan 5, 2019
@azuresdkci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@
"createMode": "Default"
},
"sku": {
"name": "B_Gen4_2",
"name": "B_Gen5_2",
Copy link

@praries880 praries880 Jan 7, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zikalino Are examples the only places these values appear at? Is there associated documentation or swagger spec that needs to be updated as well?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@praries880 I think examples is the only place where you can find these values in the REST API specs. If examples are wrong the only way to figure out proper values is to go to the portal, or use Azure CLI to create the server and then see what values are correct.

Anyway, thanks for reminding me. I did a search and found out that we could also update response values -- this PR only fixes values in the requests.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zikalino will you be updating the PR to fix the values in the responses as well?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@praries880 everything is already correct, I haven't found any occurrences of Gen4 anywhere. So I think we can go ahead and merge this PR.

@praries880 praries880 merged commit 5d20445 into Azure:master Jan 16, 2019
TalluriAnusha pushed a commit to AsrOneSdk/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2019
* fixed some invalid values in dl account examples

* updated sku as old sku doesn't work any longer
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants