-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix swagger correctness. #11839
Fix swagger correctness. #11839
Conversation
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isResolveRequired New: Microsoft.Migrate/preview/2019-10-01-preview/resourcemovercollection.json#L1238 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on preview version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
[Staging] Cross Version BreakingChange (Base on stable version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
386451d
to
a6c7f2b
Compare
...r/resource-manager/Microsoft.Migrate/preview/2019-10-01-preview/resourcemovercollection.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...r/resource-manager/Microsoft.Migrate/preview/2019-10-01-preview/resourcemovercollection.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
a6c7f2b
to
db47200
Compare
...r/resource-manager/Microsoft.Migrate/preview/2019-10-01-preview/resourcemovercollection.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
@akning-ms Would you please help to merge this PR? The fix will be released on monday but PR author need to merge it now. |
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
@innosam please resolve the conflict. Thanks. |
Done, thanks! |
@innosam Are you still need it? |
@@ -1531,6 +1550,19 @@ | |||
"description": "Gets the value of next link.", | |||
"type": "string" | |||
}, | |||
"summary": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will the summary be still needed? compared with the previous change: 0d41369
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@innosam You may need to take a look at it. It will cause lots of error in CI.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I am looking into the issue, looks like the earlier there was a breaking issue, which has been fixed by durgesh.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have fixed the issue now, and pr is green.
1. Add missing properties: isResolveRequired, totalCount read-only property to the moveResource and moveResourceCollection definition. 2. Add missing properties: ETAG/properties.errors property to the move collection definition.
9934f23
to
580aa44
Compare
1. Add missing properties: isResolveRequired, totalCount read-only property to the moveResource and moveResourceCollection definition. 2. Add missing properties: ETAG/properties.errors property to the move collection definition.
property to the moveResource and moveResourceCollection definition.
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.