We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug There are 2 license files in this repo, LICENSE.txt and cli_license_terms.md, which appear to be in conflict.
To Reproduce n/a
Expected behaviour I'd expect one license, not 2.
Environment summary n/a
Additional context The readme says this is licensed under MIT, but the package includes cli_license_terms.md.
cli_license_terms.md
The included cli_license_terms.md file says this cannot be redistributed, but the MIT license says that it can.
Can you please clarify?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@jiasli add to S162.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hi @matt-richardson, The license for the Azure CLI project is MIT as set out at https://github.com/Azure/azure-cli/blob/dev/LICENSE.
I have created a PR to remove the conflicting cli_license_terms.md license.
Many thanks, @jiasli.
You are mostly welcome. And thank you too for bringing up this issue. 😄
jiasli
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Describe the bug
There are 2 license files in this repo, LICENSE.txt and cli_license_terms.md, which appear to be in conflict.
To Reproduce
n/a
Expected behaviour
I'd expect one license, not 2.
Environment summary
n/a
Additional context
The readme says this is licensed under MIT, but the package includes
cli_license_terms.md
.The included
cli_license_terms.md
file says this cannot be redistributed, but the MIT license says that it can.Can you please clarify?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: