Mobx instead redux

[psycura]

Hello, and thank you for this awesome boilerplate.

Is this possible to exchange redux state management for Mobx?
If yes, how i can do it?

[ghost]

Out of curiosity, what would make you want to use MobX? Have you tried porting?

[psycura]

I've used redux before, and didn't like a tonns of boilerplate that i have to write,
prefer the Mobx way.

[dav-is]

Using Mobx would not allow us to use React Offline (#20)

[ghost]

I wholeheartedly agree Redux brings with it a lion's share of boilerplate, lifting the barriers to entry for many would-be coders and spurring minimalist Flux implementations like Exim. There is something to be said, however, for maintaining a course until a clear and favorable alternative emerges—and given its lower adoption and complexity, I do not believe MobX to be it.

[psycura]

jhabdas, i'm not sure, that here is the right place to discuss , however there is nothing Redux can do, that Mobx can't. And i don`t understand, why i have to write so many bolilerplate, if i can achieve same result with another tool?

[tirthbodawala]

@psycura I have not worked with Mobx before, but you can create a PR and we can test the application with Mobx, I can assist you in PR and where to make changes.
Also we can use both Mobx and Redux, Redux is mainly for Core code, any other module can be installed and used, there is no hard dependency on Redux.

Would love to study the differences and provide proper support. Right now busy with documentation and examples so that users can understand full power of boilerplate.
Thanks guys.

[tirthbodawala]

@psycua. Closing issue due to inactivity. Please re-open the issue of you are willing to continue to Mobx