Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.

Don't spell check citation keys #8

Closed
ahaeger opened this issue Aug 1, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Don't spell check citation keys #8

ahaeger opened this issue Aug 1, 2016 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ahaeger
Copy link

ahaeger commented Aug 1, 2016

When citing other papers, the spell checker picks up on the citation keys and tries to correct them. It racks up a lot of annoying warnings. See picture.

screen shot 2016-07-26 at 16 40 04

In this case, it suggests that "Dourish2004" should be "Nourished". I would like the spell checker to just skip these kinds of suggestions.

@yitzchak yitzchak added the bug label Aug 1, 2016
@yitzchak yitzchak self-assigned this Aug 1, 2016
@yitzchak
Copy link
Contributor

yitzchak commented Aug 1, 2016

Just pushed out a patch since I think this got fixed in 396f816

@yitzchak
Copy link
Contributor

yitzchak commented Aug 1, 2016

Please try updating to 0.7.1

@ahaeger
Copy link
Author

ahaeger commented Aug 1, 2016

That did it! Thanks for the fast update.

On a related note: Comments are also spell checked. I usually write todos to myself, something like % TODO Baltrunas' ideas should be explored further. The spell checker then complains on the words "TODO" and "Baltrunas'" (which is a surname). I see the point in spell checking comments, but in this case it also kind of annoying. Maybe one should be able to turn spell checking for comments on and off? I can make another issue out of this, if you want.

@yitzchak yitzchak added this to the v0.7.1 milestone Aug 1, 2016
@yitzchak
Copy link
Contributor

yitzchak commented Aug 1, 2016

I agree that the spell checking in comments is an issue. I haven't figured out the best way to resolve it yet.

Please create a new issue and I'll start working on some ideas.

@yitzchak yitzchak closed this as completed Aug 1, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants