This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add gistic-cohort-vs-histology-comparison
README
#554
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose/implementation Section
The purpose of this PR is to add a
README.md
file to thegistic-cohort-vs-histology-comparison
module to outline what was done in PR #549.This PR also adds the description of this analysis to the
analyses/README.md
fileWhat scientific question is your analysis addressing?
This is a documentation PR.
What was your approach?
I summarized what was done in PR #549.
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
This PR addresses issue #547.
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
Specifically, the
analyses/README.md
changes, to ensure that I followed the correct format there.Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
Yes, this is ready for review.
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.